Category Archives: References to James’ work

These posts deal with what other authors have written about James’ works.

Examining the ‘Mound Builder’s Calendar Stone’ Part 1

Posted on February 23, 2014 | Comments Off

Recently I saw one of the ‘artifacts’ contained in my great-grandfather’s book, Sacred Symbols of Mu, shown as proof that the first indigenous people of the Americas were the Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah. My great grandfather captioned the artifact to be a “Mound Builder’s Calendar Stone,” as shown below. In the website linked above, it has become the “Washita Calendar Stone” and you already know there are other names as well.

From Sacred Symbols of Mu
A Mound Builder’s Calendar Stone Found in the Ouachita River, Hot Springs, Arkansas
From Col. J. R. Fordyce, Little Rock, Arkansas, page 230

Links to Examining the ‘Mound Builder’s Calendar Stone’ parts One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six.

The use of my great-grandfather’s name and/or theories to bolster or support the claims of the Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah to be the only indigenous people of America were discussed in the following video entitled “James Churchward and the Muurish Empire Washita,” released in June 2010.

Essentially, according to James, all people are/were from Mu, which precludes any one people from claiming sovereignty over any other people. Another point that James made in his books was:

“As is shown by various documents, Atlantis had a colored population in the south. I have never come across any documents showing that any Negroes were known in Central and North America. Being in Atlantis and none being in Central and North America, the question was: how did they get into Atlantis? Subsequently the Tibetian map answered the question – they came through the Amazonian Sea, therefore, never touched Central or North America.”
Children of Mu page 101 (emphasis added)

In summary, the use of James Churchward’s name and theories to support or lend credibility to the theory of a black indigenous people in North and Central America is academic and scholarly fraud. While there may be other compelling evidence to suggest some validity to their claims, my great-grandfather’s writing provide none to that end.

Now, examining the ‘Ancient Washitaw Calendar‘ stone used as evidence of the Washitaw people claiming to have inhabited the Americas for 25,000 years:

Although an image of the “carved sandstone boulder” is contained in the book, Sacred Symbols of Mu, authored by James Churchward, there is nothing in the discussion of the artifact that links it to Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah, except that it was said to have been found in the Ouachita River, in Arkansas. One of the tenets of the Washita is that they link themselves with a 3500 year-old mound structure in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana, but that is not where the calendar stone was found, despite the similarity of the names.

My great-grandfather’s discussion of the ‘Calendar Stone’ from the Sacred Symbols of Mu is covered in the next installment of our examination of the background of the ‘Mound Builder’s Calendar Stone.’

PS I attempted to communicate with the ‘Empress of Mu’ prior to the planning of the podcast episode above and have left open any and all avenues of communication. I will continue to make myself available to discuss this issue with the ‘Empress of Mu’ and/or her representative at their convenience.

Have a great day.

Comments Off on Examining the ‘Mound Builder’s Calendar Stone’ Part 1

Posted in Ancient Relics, References to James' work

Another Clarification – Unknown Publication “Not Forthcoming”

Posted on September 22, 2013 | Comments Off

I recently came across an article entitled, “More Evidence of an Ancient Egyptian and Pleiadian Presence in Australia.” Written by Steven Strong, it imparts the following:

“So when leafing through segments of Mu/Lemurian expert Jack Churchwood’s soon-to-be-published dictionary of the language of Mu, it was pleasant – but no surprise – to discover the consistent identical matches between Jack’s Mu script and the non-Egyptian symbols on the Kariong walls. Clearly, the two scripts originated from the same extra-terrestrial source.”

First, I must thank Mr. Strong for according me the title of ‘expert’ (although it is counter-balanced by the spelling error of my name.)
Second, I must admit that I have been compiling a comprehensive list of the symbols in my great-grandfather’s works with their images and the “translations/interpretations” provided in the text. The incomplete document would not even rate as a rough draft and should not have been mentioned in any public discourse. The document is essentially an incomplete list of raw data waiting to be used. There should be no confusion between this document and an actual finished publication.
Copies of Stone Tablets... Cover
I have signed a contract for the publication of my next book, tentatively entitled, “Stone Tablets of Mu.” This book examines the 1927 “Copies of Stone Tablets Found by William Niven at Santiago Ahuizoctla Near Mexico City” and how this rarely viewed manuscript fits in with subsequent books written by James Churchward. His second book, it contains symbols that were never shown in James’ other books and asks pointed questions about why we don’t know more about William Niven’s discoveries.
My first book on “Lifting the Veil on the Lost Continent of Mu Motherland of Men” is going into it’s second printing.