Nan Madol Medallion Followup

Ten years ago, I received an image of a medallion found at Nan Madol in Pohnpei and I posted:

“After much research, he found out that it bears much similarity to a symbol associated with Mu” and asked what I thought.”

Pohnpei Pendant / Medallion

I looked through my great-grandfather’s materials and found nothing resembling the image and asked readers to send an email if they recognized the image.

Fast forward to 2023 and I received an email from Mariel Legria Sumallo (

I have read your post about Nan Madol and a symbol found there.

I am from the Philippines, from an Island that faces the Pacific Ocean – Eastern Samar.

Part of our tradition and written history attest of the arrival people from the Pacific. My village called Carolina, holds a tradition that a Princess arrived around 1628 and helped the locals during an epidemic.

We have some remilar images from the archaological finds from our island.

Subsequently he sent some images from Eastern Samar archaeological finds:

Eastern Samar is about 2300 miles (3700 km) from Nan Madol:

Whether or not there is a connection between the image sent in 2013 and the ones sent in 2023, I’ll leave it to the experts to decide.
If you have an opinion send an email and we’ll keep searching for answers.

btw – The earlier image is of modern design and not an ancient artifact.

Tracing the First Love Story Back to Ancient Mexico

Another article from James Churchward’s scrapbooks…

Tracing the First Love Story Back to Ancient Mexico
And Revealing the Curious Symbols Which the Natives Used in Recording the Biblical Legend of Adam and Eve in New-Old North America
Newspaper Feature Service 1931

This is an amazing tale. So amazing is it, in fact, that if original raconteur had not packed it with logic and sincerity it could hardly be retold. To believe it calls for a revision of our conception of things as they were, even to the point of placing the habitat of Adam and Eve in the Valley of Mexico or on some vast lost continent, long sunk in the Pacific Ocean!

Who ever heard of such a thing? The scoffers have not, certainly. But William Niven, who discovered two prehistoric nations in Mexico, the first in 1891 and the second in 1911, has heard of it to his delight. For it was Mr. Niven who turned up a curious tablet in Mexican ruins – ruins older than the Biblical story of the creation. He found it in the clay pits of the Valley of Mexico twelve years ago. After finding it, and scrutinizing it carefully, he submitted it to one learned society after another, but all of the experts of these societies confessed the same thing – that they could make no sense of the symbols.

In despair, only a few weeks ago, Niven sent it to Colonel James Churchward of London, distinguished traveler, explorer and archaeologist, and member of the Royal Society. Colonel Churchward has spent fifty years of his life delving far into antiquity, a great part of this time in learning the most ancient languages of man in India and Thibet.

Colonel Churchward was delighted to be entrusted with the task of deciphering what was so closely related to a literary work of his on a continent which he holds has been submerged in the Pacific – and he was greatly gratified to find himself wholly familiar with the symbols used. These symbols were in use many thousands of years before the time of Moses.

Says Colonel Churchward:

“Correctly interpreted, and links up with the legends interwoven not only with the Christian religion but with every other, this picture-writing gives the scientific explanation of the origin of woman as the better half of man.

“All credit for the discovery of the tablet itself must be given to William Niven, whose treasure hunt in the Valley of Mexico has served to throw back the date of the first human civilization far into the Tertiary Era. America has not yet begun to realize the importance of Niven’s archaeological findings, which included nearly 3,000 written tablets, many of which I have deciphered.

“But consider this. The tablets were found in Mexico, and it was in a very old temple in India that I was taught to read the oldest writing in the world. And I will confess that it was not an easy task! But here is the interpretation.

“First of all, observe the square at the bottom of the picture. In every ancient writing, the square is a symbol of the earth – and by no means because the ancients believed the world to be either square or flat. They didn’t. They used the square in this way to emphasize the importance of the four cardinal points – north, south, east, and west. The symbol, as a part of any ancient writing, indicates that the events recorded took place on earth, and not in Heaven.

“Now look at the obviously human head of the figure. The eyes being closed, as if in sleep, signify a state of unconsciousness – perhaps death. In older writings, a sightless eye means both sleep and death – to the ancients these two were one, and it may well be that they were closer to the truth than we are today, with all our scientific knowledge! Notice, then that the eyes are closed, but that out from the head are thrust two symbols like slender wings.

“Have you ever heard of the phrase, ‘thoughts have wings.’

“Poets have used it since poetry began, and poets, too, are often perilously near the truth.

“The sleeping figure is thinking winged thoughts. But, you say, does one think, while asleep? I answer you – what is a dream, but thoughts set free? That his thoughts are of cosmic significance is indicated by two small circles below the wings.

About the circle much nonsense has been written, but it simply means ‘infinity.’ Something which has no beginning, no end. It is a very old symbol, used to represent three things, which after all, are one – Infinity, the Deity, and the Universe. It is never used in ancient writings in any other sense than this. But there is on word, no phrase, in any living language, that can adequately translate the full meaning of the empty perfect circle.

“So our dreaming figure unfurls his thoughts for cosmic purposes, and what happens? Something is born! Something which in turn give birth to other things. Look at those egg-shaped figures below the head – they are ovals, not circles. The oval is always a symbol of that which leads to birth. One cosmic egg is shown emerging from the other. But observe that the upper egg also exhibits thought-forces in the shape of wings, aspiring upwards to receive the cosmic message of the dreaming man above. And that down from these wings run two off-shoots, as it were, to nourish and protect the smaller eggs that are being born from the Great Mother. Could anything be plainer?

“Now notice the curious, scissor-shaped symbol, just above the square of earth. Its points reach down to the lowest level of the square, as if enclosing it in an embrace, all the activities of life. Nothing, declares that symbol, can occur on earth – nothing productive, that is – except through the action of the law expressed in this story of the birth of woman.

“Now let us look at the story of the creation of woman, in the book of Genesis:

“And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam and he slept; and He took one of his ribs … and the rib which the Lord God had taken from man, made He a woman, and brought her unto man. And Adam called his wife’s name Eve, because she was the mother of all living.”

“Among the Polynesian Islands of the Pacific is found a universal and very ancient legend stating that:

“Taaroa made man out of red earth Araca, and breathed into his nostrils. He made woman from man’s bones and called her Ivi.” (Pronounced Ee-vee.)

“The Polynesian race has proved to be of such unbelievable antiquity that its origin can only be explained by accepting the hypothesis of a great lost continent, of which their islands are the remains. The family resemblance between the syllables of the first woman’s name in our own familiar story and in the Polynesian version is only one of a long chain of coincidences which, to the unprejudiced mind, can only prove the hypothesis.

“Modern research has revealed that the Book of Genesis was taken from a copy of a translation made by Moses from the Inspired Sacred Writings of the Motherland of Mu. Many versions of the same story are found in the sacred books of Chaldea, India, Egypt, and Greece – all obviously springing from one original source. Identically the same legend turns up in Polynesia, having been handed down for untold generations.

“Then came Niven’s tablets – another link in the chain, proving that the Garden of Eden is no myth, but a scientific fact. It covered, however, a somewhat larger area than the fundamentalists would have us believe, and it provided the scenic background for the drama we are unfolding.

“The story has taken on many amusing forms, the most amusing, to my mind, being the Greek. It is as good an example of the distortion of truth by dressing up facts with frills and flounces, powdering their noses, and rouging their lips, as I have found. Read this, a translation coming from Plato, sent to me by a professor of the Athens Historical and Archeaological Society.

“Human beings were originally created with the man and woman combined into one body, each body having four arms and four legs. The bodies were round, and they rolled over and over, using the arms and legs to propel them. By and by they began to treat the gods badly; they stopped their sacrifices and even threatened to roll up Mount Olympus and overthrow the gods. One god said, “Let us kill them all.” But another said, “No, I have a better idea. We will cut them in half. Then they will only have two arms and two legs; they won’t be round, and they won’t be able to roll about. Being multiplied by two, they will offer twice as many sacrifices, and what is most important – each half will be so busy looking for the other half that they will not have time to bother us.”

That tale certainly doesn’t coincide with the Adam and Eve story which we have been taught to believe, by the authority of the Book of Genesis in the Bible. Here is Colonel Churchward’s comment on it:

“How’s that for a fairy story? But it tells – only not half so clearly – exactly the same acts as the picture in the Niven tablet. Here – minus the frills and powder – is the story:

“Once, long ago, the earth was peopled by a race of divine beings, complete and perfect in every way. There was no sex. Man included in himself not only his positive attributes, but also those negative, receptive and altogether charming facilities belonging to woman.

“That man very soon became bored with this state of things is not at all surprising. He was so thoroughly, utterly bored that he went to sleep, and refused to wake up and go on with his job, which was, as you may read in Genesis, to make the earth a profitable, going concern, paying fruity dividends at regular intervals.

“But while he slept, he sent out, as the result of his boredom, what the modern psychologists would call a ‘wish-fulfillment-desire’ or something of the sort; those slender, cosmic wings on either side of his head.

“In other words, man prayed. And the creator, as always, heard his prayer and answered it. When the alarm clock rang, Man awoke.

“‘Another day,’ he grumbled, poking his nose into the nice warm pillow. ‘I won’t wake up. What’s the use?’

“But he opened half and eye to see what sort of day it was, and in the pale, clear light of dawn he saw – Eve. He sat up feeling a little weak.

“‘I have lost something!’ he said, clutching his throat – not his side, as has been stated so frequently by those who know nothing of the matter.

“So, discovered in America, and set out in such simple language that any child can read it, runs the true story of the origin of woman – in other words, the first love story!”

My Email Exchange With Dr. Johnny Delirious Part 2

Continued from Part 1

After the first post was published, I became aware the “Draco” alien in the second video is copied from a website named “Deviant Art” and can be seen at this link. The artist, Thomas Hauser, named his creation “Carnomoloch Warrior.”

After the first three emails came the fourth.

I thought I would send you more proof. This is me with my two helpers at the BioMed Expo and Alien Event seminar in Las Vegas September 15th. You can see the jade artifacts I had on display on my table. One I already showed you and the others I have attached some pictures for a closer look.
Lets talk if you want to know more,

Then came the 5th email.

Thank you for writing back. The artifacts all come from the same place, a dried up lake bed that over 15,000 years ago I believe was an outpost of the continent of Mu. I gathered all my information from studying the pieces themselves and shared with you some of my conclusions. I knew nothing about you or your great grandfather’s work until earlier this week. So I emailed you right away thinking about the time period was close to this culture of Mu. Frankly I thought you would like to know. I just started reading “Lifting the veil ……” I also have been writing a book on this and thought you might be interested in writing the Forward or Introduction to my book. This way you could set the record straight from “get go” so to speak. I just thought I would give you the opportunity to say in first pages “this has nothing to do with my great grandfather’s findings etc. etc.” If you do write about this in a blog, please send me a link. By the way I graduated from the University of West Florida so I believe we have some common ground. Please comment on the above
Dr. Johnny

Email #6 with a link to a Tibetan pecha library was sent.

Then, rather than continue the charade, I responded.

A little bit of background checking might have provided a bit more information about me.
As I mention on my webpage “About My-Mu” ( my research is (and was) not a continuation of my great-grandfather’s work.
Although I do not have a degree in archaeology, I do understand plate tectonics, physics, and the basic proof necessary to substantiate archaeological discoveries.

Tomorrow just so happens to be the release date for “The Original My Friend Churchey and His Sunken Island of Mu.” The original biography of my great-grandfather written by a close friend in 1937.
In the later chapters he relates conversations he had with James noting that James admits to making up his stories about the “lost continent of Mu” (i.e., the Nacaal Tablets, etc.)

Since I started my research over ten years ago, I have spoken with folks seen every week on TV and many of them have told me how rich I can become if I just flip my script and become an expert on my great-grandfather’s theories. I ask each one of them if I can buy back my integrity or honor after I do that – but you probably know the answer.

As far as the ‘evidence’ presented in your previous emails:
1. A single sheet from a Spanish language C-14 dating form is hardly proof the ‘artifacts’ displayed are that old (or genuine.)
2. The ‘artifacts’ are unknown in the historical record and have nothing in common with real artifact discoveries.
3. While some of these ‘artifacts’ could be deemed decorative or religious items, you have produced nothing indicating human habitation. Were this an outpost of Mu, along with the statues, there should have been other evidence indicating humans lived there; i.e., refuse pits or mounds, eating utensils, shelters, etc.

Here is the link to the first blog posting:

Have a great day,
J. Churchward

Here is the response in the 7th email:

I did not show the other pages because I have to keep my sources confidential (by their request)
I will share more later as well as in the AlienEvent in April
Thank you for writing back
Dr. Johnny
Sent from my iPhone

I do not believe I will receive another email, but just in case – I’ll be standing by for Part 3

Have a great day,
J. Churchward