Category Archives: Uncategorized

Hate Mail?

My research has always been about reaching the truth about my great-grandfather’s theories. As I note on the ‘About My-Mu page,’ I don’t receive any royalties from the sales of his books. In my spare time over the past ten years, I have created podcasts and added information to the My-Mu.com website.

Then comes the hate mail/comments.

I am guessing to some people, the truth is irrelevant. They would rather remain oblivious to the truth and say nasty things to make themselves feel better.

It is not a new phenomena, it has been around for years.

I would like to make it clear that if you do not like the conclusions I reach, have your little tantrum. Unfriend me, denigrate me and my research, or whatever.
It will not change the content of my research. I am not like the theorists who manufacture ‘click bait,’ and say whatever bs they think will get them on a cable TV show or sell more books.

Integrity is more important.

Have a great day.

Still Searching for Great Uighur Empire Information…

In podcasts and blog entries, I have requested information about James Churchward’s version of the Great Uighur Empire for a few years.
GUE_mapsm

Unfortunately, there have not been very many references to what my great-grandfather wrote about in English. I know that Turkish researchers continue to publish books on the subject, but that has not very helpful since they are not published in English.

My purpose for collecting this information is for inclusion in my next book.
All submissions, if used in the book, will be acknowledged and full credit given.
Send to jack@my-mu.com

Thanks in advance…

An Example of Albert Churchward’s Contributions

When reading about the early scientific theories of Lemuria, I was struck by the racism that grew out of Ernst Haeckle’s theory that Lemuria was populated by anthropoid apes. He postulated that the ‘not-fully human’ creatures left before the continent sunk and eventually evolved into the human species of today. An unfortunate extension of this theory is that the peoples still living around the Indian Ocean basin are the closest living relatives to the anthropoid apes. Their theories also supposed that dark-skinned people are somewhat lower on the evolutionary scale compared to the light-skinned authors of the theories. There is no evidence in the archaeological record to support these theories, nor can any be found that state the opposite, that lighter-skinned people are lower on the evolutionary scale compared to dark-skinned people.

Albert Churchward (1852-1925)

Albert Churchward (1852-1925)


I have known that James and his younger brother Albert (1852-1925) were at odds over their belief in evolution. James was a die-hard creationist, whereas, Albert wrote books about his evolutionary theories, as well as the subject of Freemasonry.

From the website "Black Britain"

From the website “Black Britain”

Imagine my surprize to discover a website devoted to the theory that world history has been re-written by ‘Albinos’ to cover up the actual accomplishments of ‘black’ people, using the theories of Albert Churchward, a believer in the evolutionary theories involving anthropoid apes.
On the webpage ‘Black Britain,’ the author displays the text of Albert’s Origin and Evolution of Primitive Man to show that the first people were identified as coming from Africa, populating the globe, and creating civilization.

What the webpage author fails to realize is that Albert wrote that these first ‘pygmies’ are the next evolutionary step from anthropoid apes, to be followed by Bushmen, Masaba Negro, etc. until the ‘Aryanists’ evolve. The use of an tired old racist evolutionary theory as ‘proof’ is disconcerting in any circumstance, however when it is used to attempt to prove the exact opposite, it is almost comical. The webpage author has included a passage that demonstrates Albert’s belief that ‘dark-skinned’ people are lower on the evolutionary scale than ‘light-skinned’ people while attempting to prove that “The Worlds First Civilizations Were Black Civilizations.”

The point of this posting is not to determine whether the webpage author’s thesis is correct, only to indicate this particular use of Albert Churchward’s writings does not support the webpage author’s point.