In part 1, background information on James’ legal wife (and my great-grandmother) was presented.
When I visited Joan Griffith late last century, she gave me three things. (I gave her my copy of “Books of the Golden Age.”):
- Photocopy of the entire original My Friend Churchey and His Sunken Island of Mu
- A copy of “Egypt” – a collection of Egyptian deity drawings penned by James
- A badly damaged drawing by James that was filed away until recently rediscovered.
James wrote an article for Recreation magazine in March of 1895 entitled, “Indian Joe, A Tale of the Thousand Islands.” This was presented in another blog posting in 2010 and was accompanied by the following illustration:
The recently rediscovered (and badly damaged) painting is below:

Anyone familiar with Florida will recognize the drawing was stored in an unsealed garage for some time.
In my research, I discovered that Mary Julia also had illustrations in the same edition of Recreation magazine, unfortunately unsigned. Although we do have two known examples of how she signed her drawings.

Now the initials/signature at the bottom of the ‘Too Bad’ drawing look at a whole lot like the one Mary Julia used in our examples. Also, I have never found a newspaper article or other document that showed James had a middle initial. Census documents show his two elder brothers had middle initials, but not James. I have seen videos where he has been awarded a middle initial, but his parents never gave him one and that is what counts.

The initials at the bottom of James’ Silver Hook painting (link 2):
(signed by James on the back of the painting.)
In the 1927, Books of the Golden Age, many of the drawings have the following:

In the 1930 painting “Seaside Cove,” the initials look like:

There is no flourish on the “J” in the initials or signature of James’ other paintings.
So my perplexing issue is “What is the “M” doing in the initials/signature on paintings identified as being by James Churchward?”
Is there some explanation other than the possibility Mary Julia did the painting instead of James or maybe James wanted to either provoke or compliment his estranged wife. In 1895, he had yet to marry anyone else, could he have tried to attempt to return to her good graces?
Tell me your theory in the comments or send along an email.
Have a great day.

















RSS - Posts